| |
College
student success was the focus of a number of sessions at the
2006 CAO/CSAO Institute, including ways to improve student learning
and persistence, and strategies that involve collaboration between
the offices of academic affairs and student affairs.
Grounded Retention Strategies. Despite concerted efforts
by colleges and universities to improve persistence, student
departure rates overall have remained unchanged for more than
half a century. John M. Braxton, professor of education at the
Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, discussed recent theoretical
developments in the understanding of college student departure
that offer two promising organizational strategies for four-year
residential colleges. First, he said, an institution should
demonstrate its commitment to the welfare of students.
Research has found that an enforced commitment on the part of
all college personnel—the faculty, administrators, and
staff—to treat students fairly and with respect, thereby
demonstrating an abiding concern for the students’ growth
and development, is a characteristic of colleges that promote
student persistence. Second, a college or university should
exhibit institutional integrity, demonstrating that
the actions of faculty members, administrators, and staff are
consistent with institutional policies and goals. Research indicates
that students who perceive that the institution is true to its
mission and goals are less likely to depart. Braxton offered
eight institutional imperatives derived from these organizational
attributes (see box at right).
The retention strategies instituted at Ursinus College
(PA) were in line with many of the recommendations offered by
Braxton. Judith T. Levy, vice president for academic affairs,
and Deborah Olsen Nolan, dean of students/associate dean of
the college, described their collaborative efforts to improve
student retention under the banner, “fostering student
achievement.” The first-year experience program at Ursinus
includes a two-semester interdisciplinary seminar and clustered
residential living where common academic and residential experiences
are shared. A first-year experience coordinator works closely
with academic and student affairs to support first-year students.
Faculty members are encouraged to interact closely with students
outside of the classroom and are reimbursed for meals with students
in the dining hall or in faculty homes. Upperclass students
are required to complete an independent learning experience
with a faculty member. All campus personnel are expected to
embody the culture and values of the institution.
Promoting Student Persistence. Two CIC-member institutions,
Claflin University (SC) and Lynchburg
College (VA), which have demonstrated improved retention
and graduation rates, were featured in this session. George
E. Miller III, vice president for academic affairs at Claflin,
presented an approach to retention management that incorporates
academic and student affairs staff, as well as the faculty and
students. Miller said the formula for retention success at Claflin
included recruitment, admissions, registration, and management.
A campus culture has developed at Claflin where responsibility
for student success is shared among the faculty, staff, and
administrators, as well as students. An example of this collaboration
is the role the residence life staff plays in monitoring student
class attendance.
At Lynchburg, student success is a critical component of the
college’s strategic plan. John Eccles, dean of students,
heads a leadership team that encompasses academic affairs, student
affairs, and enrollment management. Using data from a variety
of sources, a campus-wide retention committee identified a number
of initiatives to improve student success, including the creation
of an integrated first-year experience program, developing support
strategies for students with disabilities, and establishing
an “academic coaching program” for academically-challenged
students. Noting that 70 percent of students were involved in
sports at some level, the campus also improved its recreation
facilities, leading to higher levels of student satisfaction.
Effective Strategies for First-Year Programs. In recent
years, a number of CIC member institutions have developed new
programs for first-year students, including Marietta
College (OH) and Mercer University
(GA). Strategies for the first-year program at Marietta, said
Sue DeWine, provost and dean of the faculty and Lon S. Vickers,
vice president for student life/dean of students, include creating
an integrated planning committee consisting of members of the
faculty and student affairs staff, the development of residential
learning communities, and shared teaching between members of
the faculty and the student affairs staff in the first-year
experience courses. The goals of these efforts are to strengthen
the connection between students’ classroom and extracurricular
experiences, thereby improving retention.
At Mercer, a comprehensive set of programs, events, and initiatives
are coordinated by offices across the campus. Horace Fleming,
executive vice president and provost, said they start with the
recruitment of prospective students, followed by summer advising
and registration, a new student orientation class in the fall,
and then a series of first-year courses. In addition, progress
reports are sent by faculty members to first-year students at
the four-week and mid-term marks to apprise students of their
performance. Summary reports are also sent to residence life
staff members who can provide support and intervention. As a
result of these efforts, first-year to second-year retention
has risen from 72 to 83 percent.
|
|
|

| |
by
John M. Braxton, Vanderbilt University
1.
Campus personnel should embrace a commitment to
safe-guard the welfare of students as clients
of the institution.
2. Campus personnel should treat students equally
and fairly.
3. A respect for each student as an individual
should manifest itself in the day-to-day interactions
campus personnel have with students.
4. College and university administrators should
assure that institutional policies and procedures
coincide with the mission, goals, and values espoused
by their institution.
5. The day-to-day actions of college personnel
should support the mission, goals, and values
of the institution.
6. The reward structure for campus personnel should
recognize those individuals who highly value students,
treat students equally, and demonstrate respect
for students as individuals.
7. Institutional publications and documents should
communicate, when appropriate, the college or
university’s abiding concern for the growth
and development of its students.
8. Public speeches made by the president, chief
academic officer, chief student affairs officer,
academic deans, and admissions officers should
communicate the high value their institution places
on students as members of the academic community,
and should also resonate with the mission, goals,
and values of the college or university.
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|