| |
How can access to good institutional and comparative data lead
to better decision-making on campus? What are some effective strategies
for improving the institutional research capacity at your institution?
Are there easy-to-use tools that enable CAOs to have ready access
to benchmarking data? These were some of the questions addressed
in a workshop during the CAO Institute, “Using Data for Decisions:
How Institutional Research Can Help Build Institutional Strength.”
The session was led by Mary Ann Coughlin, assistant vice president
for academic affairs and professor of research and statistics
at Springfield College (MA), and Terrence Russell,
executive director of the Association for Institutional
Research (AIR). Case studies were presented by Anne Harrison,
vice president for academic affairs at Elms College
(MA), and Jill Russell, executive assistant to the president at
Springfield.
Using an approach termed “data informed triage,” Harrison described
the radical steps taken at Elms College to overcome declining
enrollment, poor retention, and dour finances. Institutional data
made the troubling trends more clear, and suggested some points
of immediate intervention, including new staff, new admissions
goals, an integrated first-year experience program, and better-targeted
institutional aid to first-year students. Four years later, first-year
enrollment at Elms was up 130 percent, the retention rate had
risen 22 percentage points, and there was a financial surplus.
According to Harrison, some of the factors critical to the turnaround
were:
-
A strategic plan with internal benchmarks.
-
A culture of data-informed decision-making.
-
Development of a “fact-book” that tracked key
indicators of performance.
The situation was different at Springfield College. Jill Russell
reported that when the current president arrived in 1999, the
college already had a well-established institutional research
function. However, in order for the college to make the best use
of a new long-range plan, as well as prepare for an accreditation
review, it needed to use data to inform strategic decisions. New
data-based mechanisms included regular program reviews and a task
force on outcomes assessment. The president’s cabinet undertook
an annual review of the college’s “evolving” strategic plan using
benchmarking data and environmental trends, established a time-line
for accreditation and program reviews, and identified additional
data needs.
Coughlin also presented a variety of online data tools that CAOs
can access through the U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated
Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), including the easy-to-use
Executive Peer Tool. It provides campus administrators with direct
access to institutional data with comparisons of up to 100 institutions.
This resource is available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/.
Terrence Russell shared with participants the wide variety of
research resources available from AIR, including training and
support for institutional researchers, as well as resources for
outcomes assessment, program evaluation, and comparative research.
AIR and CIC collaborate in an annual three-day training event
for campus-based teams. The next Data
and Decisions Workshop will be held April 20–22, 2006 in Hartford,
Connecticut.
|
|
|
|